Dyslexia: What can Neuropsychology Tell Us about Spelling and Writing?

The relationship between spelling and writing needs to be clarified, and a good place to begin is with the distinction between spelling and writing in neuropsychology. Why neuropsychology? Neuropsychological bases relate to the functional differences between spelling and writing in different regions of the brain. Therefore, the connection between spelling and writing in the context of neuropsychology becomes quite important.

Continue reading Dyslexia: What can Neuropsychology Tell Us about Spelling and Writing?

Dyslexia: What are the Ropes of PREP (PASS Reading Enhancement Program)

We are sailing deep into the theoretical sea of PREP. Without knowing the ropes, our sailing will be endless and the journey indeterminate. It is, therefore, essential to discuss the four roots, the three philosophies, two examples, and the overarching spirit of PREP

Continue reading Dyslexia: What are the Ropes of PREP (PASS Reading Enhancement Program)

Dyslexia: Mediation and Internalization in PREP (PASS Reading Enhancement Program)

Allowing the child to discover the rules with the help of a teacher or an instructor is a standard procedure in our program. If the child cannot work out those rules by him or herself, they are internalized by the child through the mediation of the instructor. The teacher, then, becomes a facilitator. Instruction becomes a combination of the teacher’s interaction with the learner and the learner’s discovery of the tricks for doing the task. Vygotsky (1978) was a great advocate of guided discovery learning, where the child is helped through prompting, but only in accordance with his needs.

Continue reading Dyslexia: Mediation and Internalization in PREP (PASS Reading Enhancement Program)

Dyslexia: COGENT Program Modules

Module 1: Squeeze and Say

The overall objective is to help students attend to instructions from an outside agent (that is, a teacher or facilitator) and then internalize those instructions. The student’s task is to follow an increasingly complex set of rules given by the facilitator. Initially, students are only required to provide a motor response (for example, when you see a picture of an animal, squeeze your hand twice; when you see a picture of a flower, squeeze your hand once).

The second level of difficulty requires both a motor and verbal response with time constraints (for example, when you see a picture of an animal, squeeze your hand twice and say “squeeze-squeeze”; when you see a picture of a flower, squeeze your hand once and say “squeeze”). The highest level of difficulty requires students to respond to and differentiate an increasing number of stimuli without picture support (for example, when I say an animal name that is long you say squeeze-squeeze and squeeze twice, and when I say an animal name that is short you say squeeze and squeeze your hand once).

This process is then applied to distinguish the syllable length of nonsense words (for example, when I say a silly word that is long, you say “long-squeeze-squeeze” and squeeze twice; when I say a silly word that is short, you say “short-squeeze” and squeeze once). Students are given opportunities to create their own exemplars in many of the activities and share these with their classmates.

Module 2: Clap and Listen

Aspects of phonological awareness and working memory (phonological discrimination, phonological memory, rhyming, and analysis of sounds in words and syllables) are the focus of Module 2. The student’s task is to respond to and discriminate smaller units of speech (that is, words and syllables) presented in progressively longer and faster sequences. For example, students listen to a series of words/syllables and when they hear a word/syllable that is different from the rest in the sequence, they clap their hands.

At first the words/syllables are phonemically dissimilar (for example, sun, sun, book, sun; ba, ba,ba,jee), and then they become phonemically similar (for example, gate, gate, hate, gate; ta, ta, ha, ta). At the next level of difficulty, the frequency of presentation is increased. At the highest level of difficulty, students produce the words/syllables sequences themselves. As in Module 1, students are given opportunities to create their own exemplars in many of the activities and share these with their classmates.

Module 3: Funny Relatives

In Module 3, the student’s task is to indicate first the syntagmatic and then the paradigmatic relationships described by the facilitator. At the easiest level of difficulty, students place two objects in relation to each other in response to syntagmatic sentence constructions provided by the facilitator. The students demonstrate both the action and the spatial relationship expressed in each sentence (For example, The kitten jumped onto the table. The kitten is hiding under the table.).

The students also respond to questions asked by the facilitator, which include both syntagmatic and paradigmatic relationships (For example, “Tell me what the kitten is doing. Why do you think the kitten is hiding?”). The level of difficulty is increased through expanding the length and complexity of facilitator utterances and phasing out the picture cues (For example, Sally and John want to have breakfast. Sally said, “We must have eggs for breakfast.” John said, “We don’t have any eggs, we must go to the store.” What do Sally and John want for breakfast? Where do they have to go to get the eggs?).

Module 4: Name Game

Module 4 focuses on onset and rhyme analysis. The student’s task is to discriminate onsets and rhymes. At the easiest level, students articulate onsets or rhymes depending on the facilitator instructions (For example, “I’m going to tell you about a very cute little baby I met. You know when babies are learning how to talk they can only say the first sound of words. When the little baby wanted a drink of water she said w-w-w. I want to see if you can tell me how the baby would say some other words.

If the baby wanted some cake what would she say? If the baby saw a fish how would she say fish?”). At the next level of difficulty, students use puppets to articulate both onsets and rhymes. One of the puppets always eats onset sounds and the other one always eats rhyme sounds. Using common words the students say what sounds each puppet eats. At the most difficult level, students match onsets and rhymes from sets of three (For example, “This mitten says s. Here are three mittens, this mitten says push, this one says last and this one says sing. Which mitten goes with s?”). As in earlier modules, students are also given opportunities to create their own exemplars in many of the activities and share these with their classmates.

Module 5: Shapes, Colors, and Letters

In this module, the focus is on the rapid naming of shapes, colors, objects, and letters. The student’s task is to identify and name a series of shapes, colors, and letters. Students complete a range of tasks with shapes first, followed by colors, colored shapes, and finally with letters. For example, students are first shown a series of five common shapes and asked to identify them. The level of difficulty is increased by having children first identify one shape, then two, then three, and so on.

Students are then shown a single row of shapes and asked to name them as quickly as possible. The level of difficulty is increased by adding rows, until students are naming five rows of shapes. This procedure is repeated for colors, colored shapes, and letters. Again, students create their own exemplars when completing these activities and share these with their classmates.

Dyslexia: Development of the COGENT Program

COGENT is based on the PASS theory of intelligence (Das, Naglieri and Kirby, 1994). As discussed earlier, the PASS theory proposes that cognition is organized into three systems. The planning system is responsible for controlling and organizing behavior. The attention system is responsible for alertness, maintaining arousal levels, and assuring focus on appropriate stimuli.

Continue reading Dyslexia: Development of the COGENT Program

Dyslexia: COGENT Program – Getting Ready to Read

“Reading is the process of understanding speech written down. The goal is to gain access to meaning.” (Ziegler and Goswami, 2005: 3)

Good readers not only understand how print is a representation of speech, but also use knowledge (language, life experiences, and so on) to derive meaning from what they read. While speaking develops naturally when children live in a culture and a community that uses language and where children are expected to interact with others, reading must be taught. Thus, if instruction is appropriate for the acquisition of reading, we could expect children who do not exhibit genetic or neurodevelopmental impairments to be reading after three years of schooling.

Continue reading Dyslexia: COGENT Program – Getting Ready to Read

Dyslexia: How does Reading Readiness Work? – A Taste of COGENT

COGENT is a cognitive and reading stimulation program. The program should benefit cognitive development, typically of developing children as well as children with special needs, such as those with limited exposure to literacy, mild developmental delay, language impairment, and children at risk for developing dyslexia and other learning difficulties. The program has been effective in skill-building, in preparation for reading in a clinical tutoring situation, as well as for small-group instruction. COGENT holds a great deal of promise as a remediation program for small classrooms.

Continue reading Dyslexia: How does Reading Readiness Work? – A Taste of COGENT

Dyslexia: COGENT Program Works – Early Evidence

Das, Hayward, Samantaray, and Panda (2006) Study

This study, done in 2006, was the first pilot investigation of COGENT (Cognitive Enhancement Training). It was essentially a demonstration of the possibilities of the COGENT program when applied to a significantly disadvantaged group of children. Admittedly, we did not meet rigorous scientific criteria; however, the study gave us an opportunity to illustrate the appropriateness and efficacy of the program.

Continue reading Dyslexia: COGENT Program Works – Early Evidence

Dyslexia: How does Reading Readiness Work? – A Taste of COGENT

COGENT is a cognitive and reading stimulation program. The program should benefit cognitive development, typically of developing children as well as children with special needs, such as those with limited exposure to literacy, mild developmental delay, language impairment, and children at risk for developing dyslexia and other learning difficulties. The program has been effective in skill-building, in preparation for reading in a clinical tutoring situation, as well as for small-group instruction. COGENT holds a great deal of promise as a remediation program for small classrooms.

Continue reading Dyslexia: How does Reading Readiness Work? – A Taste of COGENT

Dyslexia: PREP – A Remediation Program Based on PASS

The PASS Reading Enhancement Program (PREP) is a remedial program for primary school-aged children who are experiencing difficulties with reading, spelling, and comprehension. It is based on the PASS theory of intelligence and should be understood within the framework provided by the PASS theory.

Continue reading Dyslexia: PREP – A Remediation Program Based on PASS